Integrated Rail Bodies Do Not Create Simplicity – They Create Bureaucracy
Photo taken at Huerth-Kalscheuren station on 26 August 2024:
There are currently disruptions to operational stability throughout Germany (missed connections, extended journey times, short-term cancellations)

Germany’s state-owned rail incumbent Deutsche Bahn (DB) is often held up as a role model of a vertically integrated rail body – managing track and trains together. But the facts tell a different story:

As a result, DB does a lot of PR to deflect criticism. Its most recent excuse being: In the past, funds for the rail network, service facilities and stations have not been sufficient – so blaming previous governments.

But is this really true? 

Both the Member of the DB Management Board for Infrastructure and the CEO have been on the management board since at least 2015.

Despite countless analysts and political lobbyists at their disposal, why did they not ask for these funds (much) earlier?

  • To conclude: where was the much heralded ‘Guiding Mind’ – which is meant to be the purpose of an integrated rail body?

Furthermore we learn that, after the recent losses, DB plans to cut 30,000 jobs  which will mostly affect administrative jobs”.

This cutback shows: the integrated body managing both train & track had ample personnel at its disposal – despite this, it still did not deliver.

ALLRAIL Secretary General Nick Brooks says: “Rail workers should be on the front line dealing with passengers, not sitting in offices.

Evidence shows that integrated rail bodies do not create simplicity – instead they create bureaucracy. The solution must be an independent infrastructure manager focused on track construction & maintenance that serve rail operators focused on passenger growth”.